Conversational Narcissism In The Classroom :: essays research papers

In the Introduction to Linguistics class expire week, prof Ivanoff asked if the educatees had any questions about the material he had however discussed in his lecture. The preceding lecture covered marked lecture ( haggling that clearly pay back or describe only angiotensin converting enzyme object). A bookman who seemed woolly-headed asked Professor Ivanoff how the use of marked words was connected to our study of Linguistics.A student said, "Everyone knows that when you say table, a table is something with four legs and a flat surface. So table is a marked word. In a sense we already knew that because we dont go around calling everything a table." The student asked, "Is this just a definition or will it be explained further at a later time?""I do not understand wherefore you argon asking much(prenominal) a question," Professor Ivanoff said. "I just explained to you what marked and unmarked words are. Why do you ask such a question?""I a m just wondering why you told us about marked words. How is it important in our study?" the student asked."I explained it to you. There are marked words and there are unmarked words. Marked words describe definite things. Unmarked words are words that can be used to define to a greater extent than one thing," Professor Ivanoff shouted. "You ask such strange questions. I postulate a Ph.D. in linguistics. Why do you question my authority on such subject?"The student tried to explain one to a greater extent time, "I am not questioning your authority at all. I am just wandering what the connection is between marked words and Ling-."Professor Ivanoff interrupted, "If you want to question my authority you do so in my office. Please do not waste class time."Unknowingly Professor Ivanoff and the student provided a perfect example of "Conversational Narcissism" and how go along habits can hinder the process of "true" dialogue. Conversatio nal Narcissism uses " morphological" devices to dominate the conversation and mistake the attention from one partner to another. The shift response is the structural device that Professor Ivanoff used to change the charge of attention from the students question, to himself. This conversation shows that even in a simple conversation, one soul will shift the attention away from the other person to themselves, allowing them to dominate the conversation.The conversation portrayed the shift response when Professor Ivanoff failed to coiffe the students question and put forth effort to understand what the student was asking. instead of attempting to answer the question Professor Ivanoff felt personally attacked and attacked the student in return.